Dialysis Patient Experiences During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Survey Study.

Rationale & Objective: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic imposed several changes in the care of patients with kidney failure receiving dialysis. We explored patient care experiences during the pandemic. Study Design: The study team verbally administered surveys including Likert scale multiple-choice questions and open-ended questions and recorded responses. Setting & Participants: Surveys were administered to adults receiving dialysis through an academic nephrology practice after the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Exposure: Outpatient dialysis treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Outcomes: Perceptions of care and changes in health. Analytical Approach: Multiple-choice responses were quantified using descriptive statistics. Thematic analysis was used to code open-ended responses and derive themes surrounding patient experiences. Results: A total of 172 patients receiving dialysis were surveyed. Most patients reported feeling "very connected" to the care teams. Seventeen percent of participants reported transportation issues, 6% reported difficulty obtaining medications, and 9% reported difficulty getting groceries. Four themes emerged as influencing patient experiences during the pandemic: 1) the COVID-19 pandemic did not significantly affect participants' experience of dialysis care; 2) the COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted other aspects of participants' lives, which in turn were felt to affect mental and physical health; 3) regarding dialysis care experience more generally, participants valued consistency, dependability, and personal connection to staff; and 4) the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of external social support. Limitations: Surveys were administered early in the COVID-19 pandemic, and patient perspectives have not been reassessed. Further qualitative analysis using semi-structured interviews was not performed. Survey distribution in additional practice settings, using validated questionnaires, would increase generalizability of the study. The study was not powered for statistical analysis. Conclusions: Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, perceptions of dialysis care were unchanged for most patients. Other aspects of participants' lives were impacted, which affected their health. Subpopulations of patients receiving dialysis may be more vulnerable during the pandemic: those with histories of mental health conditions, non-White patients, and patients treated by in-center hemodialysis. Plain-language summary: Patients with kidney failure continue to receive life-sustaining dialysis treatments during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We sought to understand perceived changes in care and mental health during this challenging time. We administered surveys to patients receiving dialysis after the initial wave of COVID-19, asking questions on topics including access to care, ability to reach care teams, and depression. Most participants did not feel that their dialysis care experiences had changed, but some reported difficulties in other aspects of living such as nutrition and social interactions. Participants highlighted the importance of consistent dialysis care teams and the availability of external support. We found that patients who are treated with in-center hemodialysis, are non-White, or have mental health conditions may have been more vulnerable during the pandemic.

Veterans Finding Community and a "Home" Within an Emergency Housing Environment.

In April 2020, the Department of Veterans Affairs responded to the COVID-19 pandemic and escalating unsheltered homelessness in Los Angeles by sanctioning a tent turned tiny shelter encampment at the West Los Angeles Veterans Affairs medical center. Initially, staff offered linkages to on-campus VA healthcare. However, as many Veterans living in the encampment struggled to avail themselves of these services, our "encampment medicine" team was launched to provide on-site care coordination and healthcare at the tiny shelters. This case study showcases the team's engagement with a Veteran experiencing homelessness struggling with opioid use disorder and depicts how this co-located, comprehensive care team allowed for trusting care relationships formed with, and empowerment of the Veterans living in the encampment. The piece highlights a healthcare model that engages with persons experiencing homelessness on their own terms while building trust and solidarity, focuses on the sense of community that formed in the tiny shelter encampment, and gives recommendations for how homeless services might adapt to use the strengths of this unique community.

Availability of Outpatient Child Psychiatric Care During COVID-19: A Simulated-Patient Study in Three U.S. Cities.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, the authors sought to ascertain the availability of outpatient child psychiatric appointments in three U.S. cities. METHODS: Using a simulated-patient methodology, investigators called 322 psychiatrists who were listed in a major insurer's database for three U.S. cities, and they attempted to make appointments for a child with three payment types: Blue Cross-Blue Shield, Medicaid, and self-pay. RESULTS: Initial appointments were available 11% of the time, and it was most difficult to obtain an appointment under Medicaid coverage. Nineteen percent of phone numbers were wrong, and 25% of psychiatrists were not accepting new patients. CONCLUSIONS: These results are concerning given the current mental health crisis among youths and suggest the need for more psychiatrists, higher reimbursement rates for psychiatric services, and continued efforts to increase access to care. This study also highlights the need for insurance companies to maintain accurate information in their databases.

Influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on social determinants of health among an inner-city obstetrical population.

BACKGROUND: Social determinants of health are a well-described influencer of pregnancy-related morbidity and mortality. It is unclear how societal changes secondary to the COVID-19 pandemic altered the social determinants of health among pregnant patients. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate differences in the social determinants of health among patients who experienced pregnancy before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. STUDY DESIGN: This was a secondary analysis of an ongoing prospective cohort study examining the social determinants of health in postpartum patients at a single inner-city academic medical center. The planned secondary analysis was to compare the social determinants of health between patients that experienced societal changes before the pandemic and patients that experienced societal changes during the pandemic. Patients were included in the pandemic group if they delivered on or after March 30, 2020; moreover, patients in the pandemic group were compared with those who delivered before March 30, 2020 (referent group). Medical records were used to collect sociodemographic, pregnancy, and infant outcome data. The study participants were interviewed to collect detailed information regarding their perceived social, emotional, and physical environment as indicators of social determinants of health. Generalized linear modeling estimated the influence of social determinants of health  on births during the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: Overall, 577 patients were enrolled in the study, of which 452 (78%) delivered before the COVID-19 pandemic and 125 (22%) delivered during the pandemic. Patients who delivered during the pandemic were more likely to report limited social or emotional support (relative risk, 1.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-2.59) and higher race-based discrimination (relative risk, 1.59; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-2.53). Mothers in the prepandemic group were more likely to have used federally funded programs, such as Medicaid, food stamps, and the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children, during their pregnancy. Furthermore, the referent group reported more limited access to transportation. In addition, mothers in the prepandemic group were more likely to initiate prenatal care at a later gestational age and have fewer total prenatal care visits. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic created unprecedented changes in pregnancy care, and these were reflected in social determinants of health. It is imperative that we focus on the social determinants of health that were mitigated during this time and their effects on maternal and infant health.

Impacts of COVID-19 on mental health in the US: evidence from a national survey.

BACKGROUND: Studies have reported substantial effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health, but little is known whether the impacts of COVID on individuals, such as being tested for COVID or experiencing disruptions to healthcare utilization, would affect their mental health differently. AIMS: To examine the impacts of COVID-19 on depression and anxiety disorders among US adults. METHODS: We included 8098 adults with no prior mental health problems using data from the National Health Interview Survey (2019-2020). We examined two outcomes: current depression and anxiety; and three COVID-related impact measures: ever COVID test, delayed medical care, and no medical care due to COVID. Multinomial logistic regressions were conducted. RESULTS: Delayed or no medical care were significantly associated with current depression, with adjusted relative risks (aRRs) of 2.17 (95% CI, 1.48-2.85) and 1.85 (95% CI, 1.33-2.38). All three COVID-related impact measures were significantly associated with current anxiety. The aRRs were 1.16 (95% CI, 1.01-1.32) for ever COVID test, 1.94 (95% CI, 1.64-2.24) for no medical care, and 1.90 (95% CI, 1.63-2.18) for delayed medical care. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals who were affected by COVID were more likely to experience depression or anxiety disorders. Mental health services need to prioritize these high-risk groups.

"A disembodied voice over the telephone": a qualitative study of healthcare practitioners' experiences in geriatric medicine.

OBJECTIVES: This study explored the experience of delivering care remotely among practitioners in a UK geriatric medicine clinic. METHODS: Nine semi-structured interviews were conducted with consultants (n = 5), nurses (n = 2), a speech and language and an occupational therapist, and thematically analysed. RESULTS: Four themes developed; Challenges of remote consultations; Perceived advantages of remote consultations; Disruption of involvement of family members; Impact on care staff. Participants felt that rapport and trust had been more feasible to develop remotely than they had anticipated, although this was more challenging for new patients and those with cognitive or sensory impairments. While practitioners identified advantages of remote consultations, including involving relatives, saving time, and reducing anxiety, they also experienced disadvantages such as consultations feeling like a 'production line', missing visual cues and reduced privacy. Some participants felt their professional identity was threatened by the lack of face-to-face contact, linked to feeling that remote consultations are not suitable for frail older adults or those with cognitive deficits. DISCUSSION: Staff perceived barriers to remote consultations that went beyond practical concerns, and suggest support for building rapport, involving families, and protecting clinician identity and job satisfaction may be warranted.

Optimizing Medication Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder During COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2)

The COVID-19 health crisis joined, rather than supplanted, the opioid crisis as the most acutely pressing threats to US public health. In the setting of COVID-19, opioid use disorder treatment paradigms are being disrupted, including the fact that methadone clinics are scrambling to give "take-home"doses where they would typically not. The rapid transition away from in-person examination, dosing and group therapy in an era of social isolation calls for adjustments to clinical practice, including emphasizing patient-provider communication, favoring new inductees on buprenorphine and leveraging technology to optimize safety of medication treatment. Copyright © 2020 American Society of Addiction Medicine.

Impact of COVID-19 on electroconvulsive therapy practice across Canadian provinces during the first wave of the pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a procedural treatment that is potentially life-saving for some patients with severe psychiatric illness. At the start of the global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, ECT practice was remarkably disrupted, putting vulnerable individuals at increased risk of symptom exacerbation and death by suicide. This study aimed to capture the self-reported experiences of psychiatrists based at healthcare facilities across Canadian provinces who were delivering ECT treatments during the first phase of the COVID-19 pandemic (i.e., from mid-March 2020 to mid-May 2020). METHODS: A multidisciplinary team of experts developed a survey focusing on five domains: ECT unit operations, decision-making, hospital resources, ECT procedure, and mitigating patient impact. Responses were collected from psychiatrists providing ECT at 67 ECT centres in Canada, grouped by four geographical regions (Ontario, Quebec, Atlantic Canada, and Western Canada). RESULTS: Clinical operations of ECT programs were disrupted across all four regions - however, centres in Atlantic Canada were able to best preserve outpatient and maintenance care, while centres in Western Canada were able to best preserve inpatient and acute care. Similarly, Atlantic and Western Canada demonstrated the best decision-making practices of involving the ECT team and clinical ethicists in the development of pandemic-related guidelines. Across all four regions, ECT practice was affected by the redeployment of professionals, the shortage of personal protective equipment, and the need to enforce social distancing. Attempts to introduce modifications to the ECT delivery room and minimize bag-valve-mask ventilation were consistently reported. All four regions developed a new patient prioritization framework, and Western Canada, notably, aimed to provide ECT to only the most severe cases. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that ECT provision was disproportionately affected across different parts of Canada. Possible factors that could explain these interregional differences include population, distribution of urban vs. rural areas, pre-pandemic barriers in access to ECT, number of cases, ability to control the spread of infection, and the general reduction in physicians' activities across different areas of health care. Studying these factors in the future will inform how medical centres should respond to public health emergencies and pandemic-related circumstances in the context of procedural treatments.

Primary Care Team Perspectives on the Suitability of Telehealth Modality (Phone vs Video) at the Veterans Health Administration.

INTRODUCTION: Telehealth has the potential to improve access and timeliness of care, enabling primary care teams to deliver hybrid (virtual/in-person) services that will likely extend beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. To optimize its use and sustainability, it is imperative to understand how primary care teams perceive the suitability of telehealth services, including appropriate choice of mode (telephone or video). However, there is limited research on providers' decision-making processes surrounding telehealth use in primary care, including whether to use telephone or video, which this VA-focused study addresses. We examined how primary care (PC) team members determine whether to use telehealth and the mode of delivery, in the care of patients. METHODS: Qualitative case study that included 15 semi-structured interviews with employees who provided or supported telehealth care at primary care clinics at the Veterans Health Administration. We used a team-based rapid analysis approach to identify experiences using telehealth soon after COVID-19's emergence, consisting of the creation of structured summaries of each transcribed interview. The lead author then identified and compiled themes and sub-themes related to the suitability of telehealth in primary care, as well as associated quotes from transcripts. Resulting themes and quotes were reviewed and validated by 2 members of the project team. RESULTS: Primary care team members considered several factors when assessing both the suitability of telehealth for appointments, and mode of use. They were largely guided by patient-related factors including patient preferences, specific health issues, and access to technology. Additional considerations centered on team members' personal preferences and factors that supported the wellbeing of the team, such as the flexibility to work from home (work-life balance) and protection from infection. Generally, participants viewed the option of both telephone and video telehealth modalities as useful tools in the care of patients although a few respondents emphasized its inferiority to in-person care. CONCLUSIONS: Determining the suitability of telehealth services, including appropriate choice of mode is complex. Its suitability is tied to a variety of factors related to multilevel resources, preferences, and timing. When appropriate, telehealth should be considered a useful tool in the care of patients and for employee well-being.

Has the COVID 19 Pandemic Impacted the Management of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the management of chronic musculoskeletal pain; however, the extent of its impact has not been established. We conducted a comprehensive review of the pandemic's impact on clinical outcomes and healthcare accessibility for osteoarthritis (OA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), fibromyalgia (FM), lower back pain (LBP), and other musculoskeletal disorders and chronic pain syndromes to better inform clinical decision-making. RECENT FINDINGS: We examined 30 studies (n = 18,810) from 36 countries investigating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on chronic musculoskeletal pain outcomes. The available evidence suggests that the pandemic significantly impacted pain levels, mental health, quality of life and healthcare accessibility in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Of 30 studies, 25 (83%) reported symptom worsening, and 20 (67%) reported reduced healthcare accessibility. Patients were unable to access necessary care services during the pandemic, including orthopedic surgeries, medications, and complementary therapies, leading to worsened pain, psychological health, and quality of life. Across conditions, vulnerable patients reported high pain catastrophizing, psychological stress, and low physical activity related to social isolation. Notably, positive coping strategies, regular physical activity, and social support were associated with positive health outcomes. Most patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain had greatly affected pain severity, physical function, and quality of life during the COVID-19 pandemic. Moreover, the pandemic significantly impacted treatment accessibility, preventing necessary therapies. These findings support further prioritization of chronic musculoskeletal pain patient care.

An Implementation of a Community-Engaged, Group-Level Mental Health Pilot for Black and Latina Transgender Women.

The primary aim is to assess the implementation of an eight-session, group therapy pilot for Black and Latina transgender women in Chicago in terms of implementation outcomes regarding intervention effectiveness, acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility. The Exploration Preparation Implementation Sustainment (EPIS) framework guided implementation processes, including community engagement as an implementation strategy, and an implementation taxonomy was used to evaluate outcomes of acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility, in addition to intervention effectiveness regarding anxiety and community connectedness. Two rounds of the pilot were completed in 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic, at a community-based organization serving LGBTQ+ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer/questioning) youth on Chicago's West Side. Participants (N = 14) completed a baseline and postintervention assessment and evaluations after each of eight intervention modules. Descriptive statistics show improvement across measures of anxiety and community connectedness, and high mean scores across domains of acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility. Pilot findings indicate intervention effectiveness, acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility to address mental health and social support of Black and Latina transgender women. Additional resources are needed for transgender community-engaged mental health programs and research to establish core and adaptable intervention elements, scaled-up evidence for clinical effectiveness, and, most importantly, to improve mental health outcomes and the sustainability of such interventions.

Impact of the Early COVID-19 Pandemic on Burn Care: A Multi-National Study.

This qualitative study documents and analyzes COVID-19's impacts on burn care in twelve nations. Burn care saw valuable improvements in surgical techniques, skin grafting, and other acute treatments during the decades before the COVID-19 pandemic which increased severely burned patients' survival rates and quality of life. Detailed interviews, conducted in the twelve nations reveal that the COVID-19 pandemic greatly affected the delivery of acute and rehabilitation services for burn patients. Resources have been suctioned away from non-COVID healthcare and burn care has not been spared. Acute, post-acute rehabilitation, and mental health services have all suffered. Weak preparation has deeply burdened health care services in most nations, resulting in lower access to care. Access problems have accelerated innovations like telehealth in many nations. The spread of misinformation through social and traditional media has contributed to the varied responses to COVID-19. This compounded problems in health care delivery. Burn care providers delivered services for survivors during extremely difficult circumstances by continuing to furnish acute and long-term services for patients with complex disease. Emphasis on future pandemic preparedness will be vital because they undermine all aspects of burn care and patient outcomes. As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to unfold around the world, it will be important to continue to monitor and analyze the adaptability of nations, health care systems, and burn care providers.

Increased risk of diabetic ketoacidosis in an Urban, United States, safety-net emergency department in the COVID-19 era

Aims: The incidence of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) increased during the COVID-19 pandemic but estimates from low-resource settings are limited. We examined the odds of DKA among emergency department (ED) visits in the Los Angeles County Department of Health Services (DHS) (1) during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the pre-COVID era, ( 2) without active COVID infections, and (3) stratified by effect modifiers to identify impacted sub-groups. Methods: We estimated the odds of DKA from 400,187 ED visits pre-COVID era (March 2019-Feb 2020) and 320,920 ED visits during the COVID era (March 2020-Feb 2021). Our base model estimated the odds of DKA based on the COVID era. Additional specifications stratified by effect modifiers, controlled for confounders, and limited to visits without confirmed COVID-19 disease. Results: After adjusting for triage acuity and interaction terms for upper respiratory infections and payor, the odds of DKA during the COVID era were 27% higher compared to the pre-COVID era (95%CI 14-41%, p < 0.001). In stratified analyses, visits with private payors had a 112% increased odds and visits with Medicaid had a 20% increased odds of DKA during the COVID era (95%CI 7-36%, p = 0.003). Conclusions: We identified increased odds of DKA during the COVID pandemic, robust to a variety of specifications. We found differential effects by the payor;with increased odds during COVID for privately-insured patients.

Access to care: age as a criterion of exclusion? The explicit and tacit forms of ethical recommendations in the COVID era

The allocation of resources and the choices involved in such decisions is an ongoing issue in healthcare. But the COVID crisis boosted the visibility of this subject while exacerbating it, since a central concern of the epidemic was the vital issue of access to intensive care. With the prospect of a highly serious risk of shortage, the fate of elderly patients immediately became a key aspect. In particular, the question was asked if age could be a criterion from excluding individuals from intensive care units. In France, the answer to this question was overwhelmingly "No". Contrary to other countries, France refused to set a threshold age for access to intensive care. Supporting this decision, administrative authorities and learned societies issued numerous recommendations reasserting ethical principles based on equality, dignity and social justice. These texts gave the impression of continuity despite the crisis. Relating in varying degrees to the seting of standards - the recommendations all strove to guide the behaviour of the various medical decision-makers -, this corpus deserves to be studied from a legal standpoint with a view to identifying principles that come under pressure in crisis situations such as the COVID pandemic. Because while the texts conscientiously reminded readers that discriminating on the basis of age is forbidden, an indirect discrimination based on exactly that criterion can be read between the lines. And while age is combined with other specific situations or characteristics (with a thought for the residents of retirement homes), these texts can even lead to the true exclusion of the most vulnerable individuals from the general healthcare system. © 2022 Dares. All rights reserved.

Evaluating a telehealth single-session consultation service for clients on psychotherapy wait-lists

Outpatient mental health clinics across the country are struggling to meet acute demand for mental health services, resulting in months-long waitlists for people seeking care. Providing evidence-based, single-session interventions to treatment-seeking individuals while they are waiting for treatment may help address this crisis. One such intervention, the Single-Session Consultation (SSC), was found to be an effective, acceptable, and feasible low-intensity treatment option when delivered in person. The current study evaluates the telehealth delivered SSC during the COVID-19 pandemic to individuals waiting to access mental health care. Of the 147 people offered an SSC, 95 (64.63%) accepted the invitation, 74 (77.89%) scheduled with a clinician, and 65 (87.84%) attended the session, surpassing feasibility benchmarks. Participants saw pre-to-post intervention improvements in hopelessness (dz = 0.91, p < .001) and readiness for change (dz = -0.49, p < .001). At 2-week follow-up, anxiety symptoms reduced significantly (dz = 0.40, p = .04) but depression symptoms did not decrease significantly (dz = 0.21). Participants rated telehealth-SSC sessions as highly acceptable and developed a close therapeutic alliance (M = 6.13, SD = 0.76). The telehealth SSC was acceptable, feasible, and effective in the short term, suggesting its utility as a low-intensity, scalable interventions for people on waiting lists for outpatient mental health care. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved) Impact Statement The Single Session Consultation (SSC) can provide effective just-in-time mental health support for people on waiting lists. Additional studies should examine how the SSC can flexibly adapt to meet the demands of various settings and communities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)

Whole Health coaching to rural Veterans through telehealth: Advantages, gaps, and opportunities.

Background: The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is one of the largest providers of telehealth in the United States and continues to lead the way in transforming healthcare services. VHA has been implementing its Whole Health (WH) initiative since 2018, a proactive practice empowering patients to take charge of their health and well-being. A key facilitator of the WH initiative is the WH coach who partners with Veterans to achieve their health-related goals. A gap exists in the literature regarding the understanding of WH coaches' use of telehealth to engage rural-residing Veterans. COVID-19 unexpectedly interrupted in-person VHA delivery of care, including WH coaching which primarily relied on in-person delivery and focused less on telehealth. During the pandemic, WH coaches had to adapt and integrate different modalities to engage their Veteran patients. We examined WH coaches' approaches to extending coaching to rural Veterans via technology, emphasizing the advantages of telehealth, existing gaps in telehealth delivery, and opportunities for telehealth as a coaching modality. Methods: This project was implemented as part of a larger mixed methods evaluation regarding WH coaching for rural Veterans; this manuscript presents the findings from the qualitative data from the larger study. The qualitative dataset is comprised of data collected using three different qualitative methods: four focus groups (n = 11; 3-4 participants per group), in-depth individual interviews (n = 9), and open-ended responses from a national web-based survey (n = 140). Focus group, in-depth interview, and open-ended survey data were collected sequentially and separately analyzed following each wave of data collection. Findings from the three analyses were then collaboratively merged, compared, reorganized, and refined by the evaluation team to create final themes. Results: Three final themes that emerged from the merged data were: (1) Advantages of Telehealth; (2) Telehealth Gaps for Rural Veterans, and (3) Strategies for Bridging Telehealth Gaps. Themes explicate telehealth advantages, gaps, and opportunities for rural Veteran WH coaching. Conclusion: Findings highlight that video telehealth alone is not sufficient for meeting the needs of rural Veterans. Digital technologies hold promise for equalizing health access gaps; however, both human factors and broadband infrastructure constraints continue to require WH coaches to use a mix of modalities in working with rural Veterans. To overcome challenges and bridge gaps, WH coaches should be ready to adopt a blended approach that integrates virtual, in-person, and lower-tech options.

Impact of COVID-19 on Dental Care Utilization and Oral Health Conditions in the United States.

PURPOSE: We aim to understand the impact of the COVID-19 on health care utilization and oral health conditions of patients at federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), where patients are disproportionately low income, publicly insured, or uninsured. METHODS: Using deidentified electronic health records of patients at FQHCs in the United States from January 2019 through December 2020 (n = 431,509), variations in health care utilization since the COVID-19 outbreak were observed by procedure types and patient characteristics. Changes in dental utilization and oral health conditions were characterized using mixed-effect negative binomial and logistic regression models. RESULTS: Dental utilization decreased more drastically than medical utilization during shelter-in-place periods in 2020 and rebounded more slowly after the reopening. Greater demands for oral surgery and teledentistry and less demands for preventive services were observed in 2020. As compared to 2019, patients experienced more psychological stress-related dental conditions with odds ratios of 1.52 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31-1.76) for uninsured, 1.48 (95% CI, 1.07-2.02) for Medicaid enrollees, and 2.38 (95% CI, 1.68-3.40) for private insurance beneficiaries. CONCLUSION: As a result of COVID-19, patients received more invasive dental procedures due to delayed treatment and experienced a higher risk of psychological stress-related dental conditions. Continued support for statewide policies to expand access to oral health care and oral health promotion strategies for the vulnerable populations would be encouraged. KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER STATEMENT: Our study describes the impact of COVID-19 on dental care use and oral health conditions at Federally Qualified Health Centers, targeted to provide care for some of the most vulnerable populations in the United States. The results of this retrospective cohort study can be used by clinicians and policymakers on understanding the clinical needs of the vulnerable populations after the pandemic. It highlights the need for continued support to expand access to oral health care and oral health promotion to these populations.

Snakebite care through the first two waves of COVID-19 in West Bengal, India: a qualitative study.

Snakebite is a public health problem in many countries, with India having the highest number of deaths. Not much is known about the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on snakebite care. We conducted 20 in-depth interviews with those bitten by venomous snakes through the two waves of COVID-19 (March-May 2020; May-November 2021), their caregivers, health care workers and social workers in two areas (Sundarbans and Hooghly) of West Bengal, India. We used a constructivist approach and conducted a thematic analysis. We identified the following themes: 1. Snakebite continued to be recognised as an acute emergency during successive waves of COVID-19; 2. COVID-19 magnified the financial woes of communities with high snakebite burden; 3. The choice of health care provider was driven by multiple factors and consideration of trade-offs, many of which leaned toward use of traditional providers during COVID-19; 4. Rurality, financial and social disadvantage and cultural safety, in and beyond the health system, affected snakebite care; 5. There is strong and shared felt need for multi-faceted community programs on snakebite. We mapped factors affecting snakebite care in the three-delay model (decision to seek care, reaching appropriate health facility, receiving appropriate care), originally developed for maternal mortality. The result of our study contextualises and brings forth evidence on impact of COVID-19 on snakebite care in West Bengal, India. Multi-faceted community programs, are needed for addressing factors affecting snakebite care, including during disease outbreaks - thus improving health systems resilience. Community programs for increasing formal health service usage, should be accompanied by health systems strengthening, instead of an exclusive focus on awareness against traditional providers.

Developing a VR Socially Assistive Robot Simulator Employing Game Development Tools

Long-term care facilities (LTCFs) face challenges due to the personalized care required by people with developmental disabilities. The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated the issues associated with limited staff who are overworked. Such a scenario also disrupted the research and development of socially assistive robots (SARs) as access to care facilities and the elderly was restricted. The restriction sparked creative thinking and innovation aimed at addressing the challenges introduced by the pandemic. Such is the case for developing Aether™, a SAR designed to monitor falls and engage in playful activities with users. This paper presents the use of game technologies to develop a Virtual reality digital twin simulator for overcoming the lack of access to LTCFs and the elderly by creating synthetic data that simulates the robot's behavior, interactions with the environment, and virtual avatars, before its deployment. Our approach additionally allows overcoming the limitation with traditional datasets for training machine learning where depicted people and actions are not representative of the elderly population. Our preliminary results indicate that combining DTs and VR expedites robot development. We tested and compared the robot navigation, person detection, and inspection behavior while observing COVID-19 restrictions. © 2022 IEEE.

The COVID-19 outbreak and the HIV pandemic

The global outbreak of COVID-19 has imposed considerable stress on healthcare systems throughout the world, further complicating treatment of HIV and access to care for HIV patients. The many challenges that persons living with HIV must negotiate daily are now accentuated by COVID-19 imposed constraints. This includes the repetition and magnification of stigma, loss, isolation, psychological trauma complicated by healthcare disparities, additional barriers to accessing care, and depletion of already strained healthcare resources. The COVID-19 outbreak also introduces a new and perilous threat of COVID-19 and HIV comorbidity. Numerous challenges that arise with the COVID-19 pandemic also provide opportunities for persons with HIV to strengthen their individual coping skills, build resilience, and become a resource for their communities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)